Was Appeasement Justified - 842 Words

Was Appeasement a ‘Mistake’? H/W 07.03.13 There are many arguments for and against appeasement before WW2. Appeasement was a policy between Britain, France and Germany. The policy meant that the allies would give Germany what they wanted as long as they didn’t start a war or cause trouble. The Dictionary definition of appeasement is: (Government, Politics amp; Diplomacy) the policy of acceding to the demands of a potentially hostile nation in the hope of maintaining peace. Many people now oppose the policy but not many people did at the time apart from the MP Winston Churchill. An argument for appeasement is that Germany deserved to have a better deal as The Treaty of Versailles, many British people thought, was too harsh. If†¦show more content†¦So each time he did an act of aggression and nobody did anything, he asked himself â€Å"Can I get away with even more?!† And of course he could. It is thought that Hitler was very nervous about taking soldiers into the Rhineland, but when nobody did anything he grew in confidence, and this encouraged him to make more demands for land. As well as this another reason against appeasement was that every time Germany took land, they got stronger, consequently becoming harder to defeat. So in some way Britain and France were helping (in the long term) Germany by giving things that helped them in the war. Many people think that the allies should have just have faced the music and fought the war there and then while Germany weren’t as strong as they were becoming. Moreover the appeasement scared th e Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). When Germany invaded Czechoslovakia France and Britain did not do anything hence why the USSR reached an agreement with Germany called the Nazi-Soviet Pact. The pact meant that Germany and Russia would not go to war with each other and invade Poland together and spilt it between the two countries. Hitler would never of been able to invade Poland if it meant getting past the USSR. Also Hitler always had one aim: Conquer the East. The allies should of know what Hitler was going to do, as he made it very in his speeches and letters that nothing was going to stopShow MoreRelatedJustifying Appeasement Essay example1192 Words   |  5 PagesJustifying Appeasement Appeasement was the foreign policy followed by the British and French governments in the 1930s, whereby they did not attack or confront other governments, specifically that of Germanys, when international laws were breached, but rather gave into some of the demands to keep the peace. After the horror and dramatic loss of innocent lives (amassing over 3 million) in the First World War, both the French and the British governments were keenRead MoreTo What Extent Was the Policy of Appeasement the Main Cause for the Outbreak of War in Europe in 1939?1111 Words   |  5 PagesThe policy of appeasement was widely pursued by Britain and France in the 1930s, when it referred to attempting to satisfy Germanys demands by negotiation and compromise, which would avoid war. However due to its failure the policy of appeasement, to a large extent was responsible for the outbreak of war in 1939. It is clear that if the Western Powers had retaliated against Hitler, war could have been avoided, it encouraged Hitler, Hitler could never be appeased, and that it prompted the Nazi-SovietRead MoreChamberlains Policy Toward Germany Essays816 Words   |  4 PagesChamberlains Policy Toward Germany Appeasement is the term used to describe the foreign policies of the British Conservative governments of Baldwin (1935-37) and Chamberlain (1937-40) and also those of France and America to a lesser extent. Appeasement involved making concessions to the two main dictators of Europe; Hitler and Mussolini. Hitler broke many of the stipulations of the Treaty of Versailles, yet nothing active was done, there was only spoken denunciation of his Read MoreCorinthians vs. Spartans Essay1366 Words   |  6 Pagesempire’s reason to attack a potential antagonist. An empire’s decision to preemptively attack is justified because the strategy deters a growing antagonist from attacking the empire and its allies. The Spartan inability to acknowledge Athenian aggression threatens the peace of the Peloponnesian alliance. The Corinthains initiate their position by addressing the ignorance of Sparta. â€Å"Time after time was our voice raised to warn you of the blows about to be dealt us by Athens, and time after timeRead MoreCanadian Foreign Policy of the 1930s: Comparison of Articles1220 Words   |  5 PagesExternal Policy, 1931-1939, noted that the policy of appeasement as part of a path to war was adopted by the then Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King. These were however largely for self-interest reasons. On the contrary the view presented by Norman Hillmer in his Defence and Ideology: The Anglo-Canadian Military Alliance in the 1930s work that stated that a leaders hesitancy to be duly engaged in European affairs is mainly justified by the weakness in public support for various issuesRead MoreThe League Of Nations Of The United States1400 Words   |  6 PagesThe League of Nations, established in 1920, was in some respects responsible for the outbreak of war in 1939. Many argue it was the sole reason for the war; however it only played a small role in the already critical situation in Europe in the 1930’s. The policy of Appeasement, fascist ideologies throughout Germany and Italy and the Nazi-soviet Aggression pact were all, in their own respect responsible for the outbreak of war in 1939. The League of Nations played a small role in the outbreak ofRead MoreCauses Of The Treaty Of Versailles1418 Words   |  6 PagesVersailles, the rise of Hitler and National Socialism in Germany, the system of allies, and the greed and desire for expansion all brought this epic war upon the world. One cause was the Treaty of Versailles (1919). The Treaty of Versailles, signed June 28th, 1919, was created at the end of the First World War. The treaty was presented by the Allied powers, primarily the â€Å"Big Three† consisting of France, Britain, and the United States. The Treaty of Versailles created as many problems as it resolvedRead MoreThe Taming Of General Macarthur1712 Words   |  7 PagesAmerican foreign policy with his own hands by directly going against Truman s orders, which could have potentially escalated the conflict in Korea to World War III, President Harry S, was justified in relieving General Douglas MacArthur from his command of the U.S. forces in Korea. First of all, Truman s actions were justified by the fact that MacArthur s speeches and public statements spread around the world an incorrect position of U.S foreign policy in Korea, Li 2 which ended up causing many seriousRead MoreCauses of American Involvement in WWII Essay1327 Words   |  6 Pageson US soil was a pivotal beginning to the war for the United States. There were many reasons for the United States to get involved into the war and help its allies, but it was Pearl Harbor which forced us into it. Because of Pearl Harbor, Hitler and the crimes against humanity that he committed it justified United States entry into the war. But why did it even happen in the first place? The world was going to war again for the second time in 27 years(1). Economic depression was going on throughoutRead MoreMajor Cause Of World War Two ( 1939-1945 )1029 Words   |  5 Pageswithdrawing from the League of nations, Hitler s planned to strengthen the military and his troops entered Frances’ neighbor, Rhineland, in 1936. Germany now began forced anschluss, in other words, propaganda for annexing Austria (1938). Hitler justified this is an an act to restore all germans into one single homeland. Not wanting any military confrontation yet, European major powers (France and Britain) did nothing. In the same fashion, Hitler did this in Sudetenland, western Czechoslovakia and